That sounds simple, but it can be tough when 3 teams are tied!
The following example explains how this can look in detail:
Let us assume that the following results were achieved within group F:
Türkiye | Georgia | 1 - 0 |
Portugal | Czechia | 2 - 1 |
Georgia | Czechia | 2 - 1 |
Türkiye | Portugal | 2 - 3 |
Georgia | Portugal | 0 - 3 |
Czechia | Türkiye | 1 - 0 |
Then the following final status of the group table results:
place | team | points | goals |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Portugal | 9 | 8 - 3 |
2 | Georgia | 3 | 2 - 5 |
3 | Czechia | 3 | 3 - 4 |
4 | Türkiye | 3 | 3 - 4 |
At first glance, you might think: There is an error in it!
How can Georgia, with their worse goal difference, be in second place ahead of Czechia and Türkiye?
This is because the direct comparison is carried out before the goal difference is compared!
The criteria to be checked in the event of a tie are:
When comparing three teams directly, only the points and goals of the three direct encounters count.
If you only consider these three matches, the following table results:
place | team | points | goals |
---|---|---|---|
2 | Georgia | 3 | 2 - 2 |
3 | Czechia | 3 | 2 - 2 |
4 | Türkiye | 3 | 1 - 1 |
All three teams have the same number of points in a direct comparison (Crit. 2).
All three teams have the same goal difference (Crit. 3).
Next, the goals scored are compared (Crit. 4).
At this point, Türkiye falls behind Georgia and Czechia.
Since Georgia and Czechia cannot be distinguished from one another in this first direct comparison, these two are now subjected to a direct comparison again (criterion 5). Since Georgia won against Czechia, Georgia got 3 points in this direct comparison, Czechia 0 points (criterion 2). Thus Georgia is entitled to the better placement.